Blog

When charity boards break down: why relationships matter more than you think

Facebook
X
LinkedIn
Pinterest

When a charity’s leadership stops pulling in the same direction, the damage can be swift and far‑reaching.

This month, the Charity Commission ordered a charity to elect a new board after what it described as a “severe breakdown in relationships between trustees”. It’s a stark reminder that even the most mission‑driven organisations can be brought to a standstill when trust and communication fail at the top.

Boardroom conflict isn’t just an internal issue

When trustees fall out, it’s not just awkward meetings and frosty emails.

  • Strategic decisions stall.
  • Staff morale takes a hit.
  • Donors and funders lose confidence.
  • The charity’s reputation takes a knock (sometimes in full public view).

From the high‑profile dispute at the Actors’ Benevolent Fund to complete board resignations in smaller charities, the pattern is clear: fractured leadership undermines the mission.

Trust is the cornerstone of good governance

The Charity Governance Code is clear: strong, respectful relationships between trustees and executives are essential. That means:

  • Constructive challenge without personal animosity.
  • Clear boundaries between strategic oversight and operational delivery.
  • An open culture where issues are addressed before they escalate.

When these elements are missing, even minor disagreements can spiral into full‑blown governance crises.

How to keep your board united

1. Be clear on roles

Trustees govern. Executives deliver. Confusion here is a breeding ground for conflict.

2. Keep talking

Regular check‑ins between the Chair and CEO, outside of formal meetings, can defuse tension early.

3. Build a one‑team mindset

Trustees and staff should share ownership of successes and setbacks.

4. Keep skills fresh

Inductions, training, and periodic governance reviews strengthen the board’s collective ability to work well together.

5. Act on issues quickly

Don’t let personal grievances fester, as unresolved tension rarely fixes itself.

Lessons from the sector

CaseWhat went wrongThe takeaway
Actors’ Benevolent FundProlonged disputes delayed governance processes and created a toxic atmosphereTransparent, fair processes help maintain trust
SentebaleGovernance clashes led to high‑profile resignationsPublic fallouts can destabilise the whole organisation
Voluntary Sector GatewayEntire board resigned after long‑term breakdownFractured trust erodes confidence from stakeholders and regulators

Final thoughts

Healthy relationships at board level aren’t a “nice‑to‑have”, they’re the engine that keeps a charity moving forward. Without them, even the strongest mission can stall.

The good news? With clarity, communication, and a shared sense of purpose, boards can navigate disagreements without losing sight of the people and causes they serve.

Scroll to Top